Skip to content

Redskins fan mailbag: Evaluating the O-line

Nov 12, 2013, 1:55 PM EDT

Redskins-O-line-vs.-Falcons

Welcome to this week’s fan mailbag with your questions about the Washington Redskins. Remember you can hit me with a question at any time on Twitter @Rich_TandlerCSN or on the Real Redskins Facebook page. Let’s jump right into your questions:

This was one of several questions about the offensive line and I have to say that I don’t get it. The Redskins are third in the NFL in rushing and second in average yards per carry. Robert Griffin III has been sacked 18 times. Only five other NFL teams have allowed fewer sacks. I’m not sure what else you want out of a line short of preventing sacks and helping the running backs gain yardage. Have they had some bad games? Sure they have, including the one in Dallas and the most recent one in Minnesota (which I suspect is prompting all of the questions today). Should they look seriously this offseason at going younger and cheaper and having Adam Gettis, Josh LeRibeus (assuming he shows up in shape), and Tom Compton legitimately have a chance to compete for a job? Certainly they should. But the O-line is not a dumpster fire in need of immediate attention as many of you seem to believe that it is.

It looks like my friend Prem, like many others, is asking if Jim Haslett will be back next year. And I hate to disappoint you all by saying that is still to be determined. We have almost half of the season to go and if the defense turns things around like it did last year, it’s very likely that, despite the historic record that Prem points out, he will be back. That’s not set in stone; regardless of the finish, if Mike Shanahan believes that he has to jettison Haslett in order to save his job he likely will do so.

source:

The wide receiver corps will need bodies, no question about it. Santana Moss is unlikely to return and Josh Morgan would have to give a massive hometown discount if he is going to stay and compete for a job. They might look in the draft for some talent but free agency also is a possibility. However, I wouldn’t look for them to go after the specific players you mention. Nicks hasn’t been healthy for two year now. Now that Britt is managing to stay out of jail he can’t catch a cold. And Bowe signed a long-term deal with the Chiefs earlier this year. I’d look for some lesser names to be pursued by the Redskins.

First thing to say here is that while I don’t think that the ratings on Pro Football Focus are the last word by any means, but they do have some merit and PFF has Orakpo ranked as the Redskins’ best defender and it’s not really close. Disappointing sack numbers notwithstanding, there is no reason the Redskins would not welcome him back. And there’s no reason why Orakpo wouldn’t want to come back. The multi-million dollar question will be if they can agree on what fair compensation for him will be. If I had to guess right now I think that they’ll be able to come up with a deal that neither side is completely happy with but that both will be able to live with. But that’s far from a sure thing.

source:

I’ll roll the half dozen or so Nick Williams questions into this one. Yes, I think there is a very good chance that Williams will be active on Sunday against the Eagles and that he will be deep when the Eagles punt. How will be do? Sorry, can’t tell you that. His only preseason return was a 29-yard effort so that has to be considered a good sign. But they don’t run live punt returns during training camp and we can’t see the walkthroughs they do in practice at Redskins Park. We will all have to find out together. If he catches the ball cleanly and doesn’t go backwards, he will at least not be a downgrade compared to what they have been putting out there.

source:

One more question rolling up many. I picked this one because of the last part is something that nobody else asked. I have heard that Bruce Allen is not going anywhere regardless of what happens to Mike Shanahan. The fates of the two are not intertwined. As to Shanahan, I think a lot depends on how this season finishes out. If the Redskins can get to, say, 8-8 or thereabouts I think Shanahan gets a one- or two-year extension. If the Redskins win a few more games but still end up with double-digit losses I think that an extension becomes very problematic. If the team collapses are there are signs that Shanahan is losing the locker room, all bets on the coach’s future are off.

  1. Jesse C - Nov 12, 2013 at 3:05 PM

    I strongly think,that the DB,Safety and DL are positions that should be priorities during the offseason. If the defense were solidified,the Skins would be very formidable for years to come.

  2. eenworom - Nov 13, 2013 at 9:11 AM

    The skins problems are inconsistent play calling
    Defensive pressure on the qb

    We have to face it, haslett is not working out!

    Orakpo should have been traded for some value!

  3. stevie7018stevie7018 - Nov 13, 2013 at 5:32 PM

    I think you have to give the the Shannahans and Haslett at least 1 more year after this season. Reason being is the Redskins were given an $18 mil cap hit the last 2 years ($36 mil total over 2 years) and have not had the cap room to add any good quality players. If you remember in the offseason they didn’t even know if they could sign Fletch. Since 2014 the cap hit is no longer applied they can go out and get some playmakers. Then if they dont produce you can let them walk

RealRedskins.com Archives

Follow Us On Twitter