Sep 19, 2013, 12:00 PM EDT
It seems obvious now that the Redskins would have been better off if Robert Griffin III had played during the preseason. The quarterback has spent the first two games getting used to playing on his reconstructed right knee and the accompanying knee brace, and trying to get in synch with his teammates.
The need for adjustments was to be expected. But certainly it would have been better to get them out of the way when the games don’t count. The Redskins gladly would have sacrificed their undefeated preseason for a quarterback who had knocked off some of the rust by the regular season opener.
But saying that Griffin should have played during the preseason is presenting a false argument. As Mike Shanahan reminded us yesterday, Griffin couldn’t play in the preseason:
“I don’t know if anybody remembers, but Dr. Andrews said that there was no way he could play during the preseason. Does anybody remember that? We have to go back to this? Dr. Andrews said he could not play during the preseason. There was no chance for him to play.”
So while the topic of Griffin playing in the preseason might make for a nice academic discussion, it really has no footing in reality. Just keep that in mind when you hear it being discussed, which is going to happen until Griffin looks like the RG3 of 2012.
Follow Us On Twitter
- Shanahan on RG3's struggles: Injuries not the issue
- OPEN THREAD: Should the Redskins do Hard Knocks?
- Redskins OTA to-do list: Outside linebackers
- Examining Redskins' RG3's passing under pressure
- PHOTO: RG3 returns to social media to share birth of baby girl
- Redskins at the crossroads: RB Chris Thompson
- Five offensive players with work to do during Redskins OTAs
- Redskins OTA to-do list: Wide receivers and tight ends
- Redskins Ryan Kerrigan named to NFL's Top 100 list
- OPEN THREAD: How will new extra point rule affect Kai Forbath?