Comments on: Jansen, Moss salary cap implications http://realredskins.com/2009/06/jansen-moss-salary-cap-implications/ A blog for sophisticated Redskins fans Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:03:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://realredskins.com/2009/06/jansen-moss-salary-cap-implications/comment-page-1/#comment-1760 Anonymous Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:18:55 +0000 1164377296#comment-1760 here here !!<br /><br />having jansen running 3rd at RT was a total waste.. if he had been a rookie or free agent would anyone be concerned if the 3rd best RT was cut ? i seriously doubt it.<br /><br />the only reason for keeping him after last year was the financial<br />side of his deal.. once that was rendered less burdensome, it was time to move on.. the fact that detroit offerred him a contract is irrelevant to what needed to be done<br /><br />shally here here !!

having jansen running 3rd at RT was a total waste.. if he had been a rookie or free agent would anyone be concerned if the 3rd best RT was cut ? i seriously doubt it.

the only reason for keeping him after last year was the financial
side of his deal.. once that was rendered less burdensome, it was time to move on.. the fact that detroit offerred him a contract is irrelevant to what needed to be done

shally

]]> By: Rich Tandler http://realredskins.com/2009/06/jansen-moss-salary-cap-implications/comment-page-1/#comment-1759 Rich Tandler Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:07:19 +0000 1164377296#comment-1759 I have to think, Joe, that the replacement already is on the roster.<br /><br />Why pay a $1.5 million roster bonus if you're virtually certain that he's not going to make the roster anyway? That leaves even less to spend in his replacement if one is needed. <br /><br />They weren't trying him out at backup center because they thought he was part of the solution at right tackle, that's for sure. I have to think, Joe, that the replacement already is on the roster.

Why pay a $1.5 million roster bonus if you're virtually certain that he's not going to make the roster anyway? That leaves even less to spend in his replacement if one is needed.

They weren't trying him out at backup center because they thought he was part of the solution at right tackle, that's for sure.

]]> By: Joe in Raleigh http://realredskins.com/2009/06/jansen-moss-salary-cap-implications/comment-page-1/#comment-1758 Joe in Raleigh Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:57:02 +0000 1164377296#comment-1758 So after cutting Jansen, they have fewer options at RT and less money to spend on his replacement. Can't say this seems like really inspired thinking. So after cutting Jansen, they have fewer options at RT and less money to spend on his replacement. Can't say this seems like really inspired thinking.

]]>