<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pearl Harbor Crew II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realredskins.com/2006/10/pearl-harbor-crew-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realredskins.com/2006/10/pearl-harbor-crew-ii/</link>
	<description>A blog for sophisticated Redskins fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:03:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://realredskins.com/2006/10/pearl-harbor-crew-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realredskins.com/?p=347#comment-889</guid>
		<description>The problem is obvious.  Joe Gibbs should step down.  He assembled a group of coaches and players who can&#039;t get the job done.  What&#039;s the point of having the best receiving corps in football, if no one can block for the quarterback.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://gibbsmustgo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is obvious.  Joe Gibbs should step down.  He assembled a group of coaches and players who can&#8217;t get the job done.  What&#8217;s the point of having the best receiving corps in football, if no one can block for the quarterback.</p>
<p><a href="http://gibbsmustgo.com" rel="nofollow">http://gibbsmustgo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UtterDev</title>
		<link>http://realredskins.com/2006/10/pearl-harbor-crew-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>UtterDev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realredskins.com/?p=347#comment-887</guid>
		<description>Rich, could you post an update to your post from February, supporting the decision to waive Walt Harris. I think you made some great points at the time. But in hindsight, was the 2 million that the Skins saved, worth the dire predicament that the current secondary is in, while Harris has a tremendous year for the 49ers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich, could you post an update to your post from February, supporting the decision to waive Walt Harris. I think you made some great points at the time. But in hindsight, was the 2 million that the Skins saved, worth the dire predicament that the current secondary is in, while Harris has a tremendous year for the 49ers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt K</title>
		<link>http://realredskins.com/2006/10/pearl-harbor-crew-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realredskins.com/?p=347#comment-886</guid>
		<description>Rich, you&#039;re onto something at the end of your post there.  A bad pass defense, such as the Redskins have put on the field this season, is a major liability (and remember, the last two QBs who threw on us successfully, Carr and Leftwich, aren&#039;t exactly first round fantasy picks).  There&#039;s only way to make up for consistently soft coverage and propensity to give up big plays -- you&#039;ve got to make big plays of your own.  The &#039;83 Skins are a good example; last year&#039;s Bengals are another.  Ranked 26th in passing defense, they limited the damage with 32 picks and got a home game in the playoffs.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, the line on Gregg Williams&#039;s defenses here -- for all the talk of his &quot;aggressiveness&quot; and constant blitzing -- is that they&#039;ve lacked the big play component.  In fact, despite top-10 defenses in &#039;04 and &#039;05, we&#039;ve been in the bottom third of the takeaway column both years.  That&#039;s why this year&#039;s Pass Def struggles are so worrisome -- we give up a ton of yards, and we&#039;re not likely to get a lot of counter-balancing big plays.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I wish I could be confident that Springs&#039;s return would be a magic potion, but we don&#039;t even know when he&#039;s going to come back... Remember McNabb and his sports hernia?  It&#039;s a bad injury.  We need Rogers to figure it out on the coverage end, or, failing that, Archuleta and Sean Taylor -- if they&#039;re going to get beaten -- to at least make some huge turnover plays.  If neither of those guys racks up the picks or gets in the end zone this year, there&#039;s only so far that our rebuilt offense can take us...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich, you&#8217;re onto something at the end of your post there.  A bad pass defense, such as the Redskins have put on the field this season, is a major liability (and remember, the last two QBs who threw on us successfully, Carr and Leftwich, aren&#8217;t exactly first round fantasy picks).  There&#8217;s only way to make up for consistently soft coverage and propensity to give up big plays &#8212; you&#8217;ve got to make big plays of your own.  The &#8216;83 Skins are a good example; last year&#8217;s Bengals are another.  Ranked 26th in passing defense, they limited the damage with 32 picks and got a home game in the playoffs.  </p>
<p>Of course, the line on Gregg Williams&#8217;s defenses here &#8212; for all the talk of his &#8220;aggressiveness&#8221; and constant blitzing &#8212; is that they&#8217;ve lacked the big play component.  In fact, despite top-10 defenses in &#8216;04 and &#8216;05, we&#8217;ve been in the bottom third of the takeaway column both years.  That&#8217;s why this year&#8217;s Pass Def struggles are so worrisome &#8212; we give up a ton of yards, and we&#8217;re not likely to get a lot of counter-balancing big plays.  </p>
<p>I wish I could be confident that Springs&#8217;s return would be a magic potion, but we don&#8217;t even know when he&#8217;s going to come back&#8230; Remember McNabb and his sports hernia?  It&#8217;s a bad injury.  We need Rogers to figure it out on the coverage end, or, failing that, Archuleta and Sean Taylor &#8212; if they&#8217;re going to get beaten &#8212; to at least make some huge turnover plays.  If neither of those guys racks up the picks or gets in the end zone this year, there&#8217;s only so far that our rebuilt offense can take us&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
