Skip to content

Redskins Under Wraps.

Jul 5, 2005, 10:04 PM EDT

The Washington Redskins released the schedule of training camp practices that are open to the public. You can find it several places online, but I’ll copy it below. Really, it’s no problem. It’s not like it takes up much space.

Monday, August 1–4:00 PM Practice
Tuesday, August 2–4:00 PM Practice
Wednesday, August 3–8:30 AM Practice
Thursday, August 4–4:00 PM Practice
Friday, August 5–4:00 PM Practice
Monday, August 8–4:30 PM Practice
Tuesday, August 9–4:30 PM Practice
Thursday, August 11–8:30 AM Practice

Assuming that each practice lasts about two hours, that’s 16 hours of training camp over a 12-day period that are open to the public. If that doesn’t seem like a lot, that’s because it’s not. Compare that to the Cowboys’ open training camp schedule . I really don’t want to post that here as it would take up a lot of room to post the details of the 70 hours of camp that their fans can attend over a 22-day period. There are 15 instances of two-a-days being open, so if someone travels a long distance to see Dallas practice, they can go in the morning and watch one practice, go eat lunch, and come back for another session before going home. All of the Redskins’ practices are single-session affairs.

The Giants will open about 46 hours of practices over the course of 26 days. Packers Backers will be able to attend practices all the way through the 28th of August. A random look around at about 10 NFL team sites revealed that all who had released their camp schedules had well over twice the hours of practice available to their fans as did the Redskins and all had numerous two-a-days available.

To be sure, not having polled every team, to say that the access Redskins fans have during camp is among the worst in the NFL is an educated guess. But it’s a fact the opportunity for the members of the press to observe the Redskins during minicamp and training camp is the worst in the league. The Professional Football Writers’ Association (PFWA) did a survey among its members and the Redskins were the last in the league when it came to letting reporters watch mincamp and training camp practices.

What’s the downside here? For the fans, it’s the fact of the limited access itself. There are that many fewer opportunities to go and hang out with a few thousand fellow Redskins fans, catch some of practice (or try to, anyway; there are no stands and if you’re not there early enough to get along the fence it’s hard to see anything more than footballs flying in there air) and maybe gather in an autograph or two. The no two-a-days means that a fan driving some distance to get to Redskins Park will have to stay overnight in order to catch two practices. Finally, because there are so few practices open, the attendance at each one numbers in the thousands. If the attendance opportunities are greater, the crowds at each session will be smaller and you will have a better chance to get the prime real estate on the fence line and a prime signature on your hat.

Certainly you’re not in the least interested in how these policies make life more difficult on the members of the press corps. Perhaps, though, you may take notice in the effect that they have on the coverage of the team. First, it’s difficult to get stories about the younger players, the longshots to make the team. The writers have to do stories about Patrick Ramsey, Shawn Taylor, Clinton Portis and the other big names on the team. The limited access to practice leaves little time to observe and write about the lesser-known starters, let along the up-and-comers. An example: a few years ago I heard Hue Jackson, the Redskins running backs coach at the time, constantly yelling at Sultan McCullough, an undrafted free agent running back. Over the course of a few practices I deduced and wrote that McCullough had an excellent chance of making the team; otherwise, why would Jackson waste so much time observing and correcting him? Had I had to spend my time focusing on the “must-have” stories, I would not have been able to make that observation. (I wouldn’t be telling this story, of course, if McCullough didn’t make the final cut.)

Also, you can only observe some things over the course of time. Last year, when the Redskins had a similar camp access schedule, the passing game drills with Ramsey and Mark Brunell looked sloppy. You hear about passing drills where the ball never hits the ground. The balls those two were throwing were quickly grass stained. It’s not unusual, though for a team to start out that way and improve as camp goes on. With nobody around to observe, however, there’s no objective viewpoint to report whether or not such things improve over the course of camp. We found out the answer to the passing game question eventually last year, but it took a few games into the regular season.

There is one person who must sign off on the training camp schedule and that is Joe Gibbs. This is his idea, and it’s a new one for him. In his first stint as the Redskins coach, Gibbs was average to above average in the amount of camp sessions that fans and writers could attend. Now if you blink, you miss it.

There is no doubt here that Gibbs is doing this for one simple reason, the same reason he does almost anything else, because he thinks it will help the team win more football game. From what I can gather, most of the other writers assign no ulterior motives to Gibbs. All of us, though, are equally puzzled as to how what’s observed and reported on during a camp practice is going to harm the Redskins. It’s not like we’re going to write that they like to throw the X-Right, Red Zoom 32 on third and between six and eight or that a particular blitz package is getting consistently good penetration. You just can’t tell that much when the players are going at most ¾ speed most of the time.

There are two possible reasons why Gibbs wants to restrict access that I can come up with. One is that he doesn’t want reporting on injuries to key players. But, by NFL fiat that’s all public info by the time the game starts so that’s pretty marginal. The other is that he may not want the identities of the young players who are performing well in practice to get out to other teams. This makes a little more sense. Gregg Williams said at minicamp last month that the Redskins had 11 undrafted free agents on defense by the end of the year in 2004 and a good number of them were cut in camp and, having made a good impression, were signed back up when the need arose. Still, having such severe limitations on access seems to be a bit extreme to keep secret a player that everyone else can see on film from college and from preseason games.

It’s Gibbs right to be paranoid, but the two of his fellow NFC East coaches who coach the high-access teams listed above, Bill Parcells of the Cowboys and Tom Caughlin of the Giants, have been known to hear voices when nobody else does, too. But they have seen value in letting the fans and those who deliver information to them extensive access to training camp practices. It would be great if Joe Gibbs did the same.

  1. Doug - Jul 6, 2005 at 8:13 AM

    It is possible that Joe Gibbs would view fans and press at training camp as a distraction. If the lack of training camp visibility helps us win football games, I will be happy.

    So, I turn your question around. How does this hurt Redskins fans? The only criteria I have is that we do whatever it takes to help win football games. What difference does it make what other teams do?

    Once again, I think I will trust Joe Gibbs to make reasonable decisions. He does have a track record.

  2. Doug - Jul 6, 2005 at 8:13 AM

    It is possible that Joe Gibbs would view fans and press at training camp as a distraction. If the lack of training camp visibility helps us win football games, I will be happy.

    So, I turn your question around. How does this hurt Redskins fans? The only criteria I have is that we do whatever it takes to help win football games. What difference does it make what other teams do?

    Once again, I think I will trust Joe Gibbs to make reasonable decisions. He does have a track record.

  3. Anonymous - Jul 6, 2005 at 12:21 PM

    I tend to agree. If it helps win games, then I don’t mind. I remember some of the Gibbs interviews from early last year. He said that one of the most significant changes from his first stint is the level of press coverage, scrutiny, pressue, etc. He was shocked and it was a significant adjustment. While press access is important and legitimate, I’m sure Gibbs doesn’t find it helpful to his overall cause. This may have something to do with the limited camp access. I’m sure there’s an element of secrecy as well so that teams don’t become too familiar with all the features of his “new-look” offense – which will be significantly changed from last year. He the Skins win the Super Bowl next year, I’ll trade all camp access for the next decade.

  4. Anonymous - Jul 6, 2005 at 12:21 PM

    I tend to agree. If it helps win games, then I don’t mind. I remember some of the Gibbs interviews from early last year. He said that one of the most significant changes from his first stint is the level of press coverage, scrutiny, pressue, etc. He was shocked and it was a significant adjustment. While press access is important and legitimate, I’m sure Gibbs doesn’t find it helpful to his overall cause. This may have something to do with the limited camp access. I’m sure there’s an element of secrecy as well so that teams don’t become too familiar with all the features of his “new-look” offense – which will be significantly changed from last year. He the Skins win the Super Bowl next year, I’ll trade all camp access for the next decade.

  5. Joe - Jul 8, 2005 at 9:52 AM

    This is a surprising decision by Gibbs. Given that the Wizards are Nationals are starting to draw Washington sports fans, I would have expected the Redskins to reach out to area fans more enthusiastically. Also, Gibbs has a history in NASCAR, a sport that gives its followers unparalleled access to its stars. The “benefit” of the policy, as Rich points out, is marginal because the teams have to make injury news public and up-and-comers will be seen in preseason games anyway.

    Personally, I like getting camp coverage from newspapers or the web. It’s an exciting part of the season. So, it’s disappointing that the Skins are cutting off so much of their media access. Although, one has to wonder whether they’re doing it just to promote the access they provide on redskins.com.

  6. Joe - Jul 8, 2005 at 9:52 AM

    This is a surprising decision by Gibbs. Given that the Wizards are Nationals are starting to draw Washington sports fans, I would have expected the Redskins to reach out to area fans more enthusiastically. Also, Gibbs has a history in NASCAR, a sport that gives its followers unparalleled access to its stars. The “benefit” of the policy, as Rich points out, is marginal because the teams have to make injury news public and up-and-comers will be seen in preseason games anyway.

    Personally, I like getting camp coverage from newspapers or the web. It’s an exciting part of the season. So, it’s disappointing that the Skins are cutting off so much of their media access. Although, one has to wonder whether they’re doing it just to promote the access they provide on redskins.com.

  7. Anonymous - Jul 8, 2005 at 6:43 PM

    Joe, that makes no sense. The biggest reason to limit access is to limit distractions. The Nats and Wizards don’t have a thing to do with it. If I recall, years ago many camps, both Pro. and college, were held in complete isolation. Today’s players or their union would not allow it, but it does not mean the end product would not be better. You may find fault in the outcome post season, but to pile it on over such a simple and meaningless (except to reporters) setup is silly.

  8. Anonymous - Jul 8, 2005 at 6:43 PM

    Joe, that makes no sense. The biggest reason to limit access is to limit distractions. The Nats and Wizards don’t have a thing to do with it. If I recall, years ago many camps, both Pro. and college, were held in complete isolation. Today’s players or their union would not allow it, but it does not mean the end product would not be better. You may find fault in the outcome post season, but to pile it on over such a simple and meaningless (except to reporters) setup is silly.

  9. Anonymous - Jul 8, 2005 at 8:05 PM

    The Redskins only have to worry about competing for fans if the Wizzards and Nats continue to win and do well and the Redskins continue to be one of the worst teams in the NFL. If the Redskins win, then nobody will care about camp coverage. I like keeping up with the camp coverage also, but I’ll gladly give up such coverage if the Redskins start winning again.

  10. Anonymous - Jul 8, 2005 at 8:05 PM

    The Redskins only have to worry about competing for fans if the Wizzards and Nats continue to win and do well and the Redskins continue to be one of the worst teams in the NFL. If the Redskins win, then nobody will care about camp coverage. I like keeping up with the camp coverage also, but I’ll gladly give up such coverage if the Redskins start winning again.

RealRedskins.com Archives

Follow Us On Twitter