Skip to content

Draft: Separating the Smoke From the Fire

Apr 15, 2005, 7:50 PM EDT

Baseball has its Hot Stove League. NASCAR has what’s called Silly Season. The NFL doesn’t have a catchy name for the annual barrage of chatter that happens every year in the few weeks prior to its annual selection meeting, but it’s just as hot and just as silly nonetheless.

Remember, back in the day, that cloud of hazy smoke that would hang over an event such as a Grateful Dead concert? The atmosphere around the NFL draft is beginning to resemble something just that whacky.

There are a few reasons for all of the buzz other than the immense popularity of the NFL and the intense interest in the draft. One of the very nature of NFL draft deals. While some are completed in advance of the draft, most are made while one of the teams involved is on the clock. It’s not until then that the teams involved know exactly what they’re trading.

Due to the necessity that deals be conducted at the last minute, there is nothing concrete in the days leading up to the draft. In the place of hard news are reports from anonymous team and league sources, speculation and some stuff that was just made up.

Of course, the Internet increases both the number of rumors making the rounds and the speed at which the stories travel exponentially. What used to be speculation being chewed over by a few guys enjoying a cold one after work is now spread to hundreds if not thousands in course of an evening. On top of that, there’s the constant pressure for the major sports Websites such as ESPN.com and CBS Sportsline to come up with new content—something posted three or four hours ago is sometimes considered old news. The compressed news cycle demands that stories be published before they’re fully developed. This leads to an increase in the quantity of stories and a decrease in the quality of them.

Speaking of low quality, there are also dozens of self-declared draft “experts” with their own Websites out there. At best they serve up rehashes of other reports; at worst they engage in sheer, uninformed speculation and rumormongering.

To be sure, there was no shortage of smoke being blown by NFL teams prior to the advent of the Internet. Back when the World Wide Web was just a gleam in Al Gore’s eye, Redskins GM Bobby Beathard would annually dole out vast amounts false information to the media. In fact, a good way to figure out who the Redskins would draft would be to take a list of prospects and cross off the name of any player that Beathard mentioned in public. Whoever was left had a shot at being picked.

In fact, a search of the Post’s archives reveals not one instance of Beathard being quoted uttering the name “Darrell Green” in the weeks prior to the 1983 draft. Green, of course was the Redskins’ first-round selection.

One thing is for sure. As Vinny Cerrato said at this time last year, “These next two weeks, you can’t believe anything you hear.”

And, just like at that Dead concert, be careful of how much of that smoke you take in. In both cases it can lead to faulty judgment.

  1. Marcus Edwards - Apr 20, 2005 at 9:50 PM

    Great analogy. I am a huge fan of both the Grateful Dead and the Redskins.
    Some of my favorite Dead shows were at RFK Stadium. It gave me an extra thrill seeing my favorite band on the same field the Redskins played on.

  2. Marcus Edwards - Apr 20, 2005 at 9:50 PM

    Great analogy. I am a huge fan of both the Grateful Dead and the Redskins.
    Some of my favorite Dead shows were at RFK Stadium. It gave me an extra thrill seeing my favorite band on the same field the Redskins played on.

  3. Marcus Edwards - Apr 21, 2005 at 1:50 AM

    Great analogy. I am a huge fan of both the Grateful Dead and the Redskins.
    Some of my favorite Dead shows were at RFK Stadium. It gave me an extra thrill seeing my favorite band on the same field the Redskins played on.

RealRedskins.com Archives

Follow Us On Twitter