Feb 12, 2005, 2:46 AM EDT
From the same Post article quoted above:
The team also announced that Gibbs will answer questions from fans Tuesday from 6 to 7 p.m. on WJFK-FM. Gibbs conducted a weekly show on WTEM-AM during the 2004 season, but was unhappy with recent comments made about him by its hosts and is not expected to continue his relationship with the station. Gibbs said during his most recent news conference that he is considering alternative avenues to interact directly with fans.
So it appears that Gibbs has fired The Team’s Steve Czaban and Andy Pollin as hosts of his call-in show. It’s unclear exactly what one or both of them said to provoke this action by Gibbs, but the best guess is that it was Czaban speculating, or passing along and discussing speculation, that Gibbs may have come back to the Redskins strictly for the money.
I caught Czaban in the middle of discussing Gibbs on his show on Fox Sports Radio this morning. Right when I tuned him in he was saying something about the coming back for the money thing was something he talked about because it was a topic that was on other peoples’ minds. He then went into an analogy about how Gibbs was the dad that nobody ever thought would come back, but he did.
I’m probably in a minority among Redskins fans in that I like Czaban and Pollin. I’ve been on the Sports Reporters a few times and they’ve been very generous in giving me air time to promote my books. Last fall I was in the studio with them for an hour and a half and they were extremely cordial and, in the course of conversation, they revealed themselves to be real Redskins fans. Still, I do think that they, particularly Czaban, say some things that are out of line sometimes and speculating that Gibbs was in it for the money certainly was outrageous, whether or not others were talking about it.
Was it OK for Gibbs to jettison his radio show with Czaban and Pollin because he didn’t like what they said about him, outside of the context of the show? Keep in mind that it’s not certain that the move was made in reaction to the “in it for the money” thing. It may have been that one comment, it may have been an accumulation of things that they said.
No matter what it was, while Gibbs certainly is free to be on whatever radio show he wants, it’s a bit disturbing that he bailed on WTEM for the stated reason. The incident could have a chilling effect on interviews and reporters who cover the team. Extreme softball could become the game of the day as far as the media is concerned, out of fear of losing access. Imagine coverage like this:
Interviewer: Coach, great call on that second and four in the third quarter. How did you know that play would gain five?
TV Anchor: And, next in sports, the big Redskins news–Joe Gibbs’ grandson gets a puppy for his birthday.
Follow Us On Twitter
- NFL to interview players named in Al-Jazeera report, what does that mean for Manning?
- Redskins' McCoy on backing up Cousins: 'I try to help him as much as I can'
- Need to Know: The Redskins week that was—Cousins on the rise
- Redskins position preview: Cornerbacks
- Will the Redskins air it out more in 2016?
- Need to Know: The top five receivers the Redskins will face in 2016
- Redskins' Callahan on Lichtensteiger: 'We’re fortunate to have him'
- As deadline approaches, little momentum for Kirk Cousins' long-term deal
- Left guard preview: Big competition coming at Redskins camp
- Need to Know: RB Arian Foster says he’s ready to go—should the Redskins call?